Research focus

The Home – An Arena and Intersection



We place the home at the center—both the focus and the point of departure for everyday electricity use.

The home exists within, is influenced by, and in turn influences the surrounding electricity system, and sometimes also various intermediary organizational forms such as energy communities. How the interaction between these actors takes shape is influenced by the national and global context. A complementary categorization is based on four different, but not isolated, societal dimensions that affect both the electricity system and the home: the social, technical, economic, and political dimensions. Based on this schematic figure, we develop in the following sections the research questions that form the foundation of the research projects.

The home is an arena for people’s everyday lives and a place of continuity, social relationships, and identity formation. In order to live and carry out everyday activities, we use electrical devices—ranging from heat pumps and solar panels to routers, refrigerators, washing machines, and computers. In addition to power outlets, the primary interface between homes and smart grids consists of the smart meters with which all homes in Sweden are equipped. These enable remote reading of information about a home’s electricity consumption for billing purposes and for the automated control of electricity use, which helps maintain balance in the power grid. However, automated load control can also entail risks and increase vulnerability.

Our acceptance and use of new technology, as well as the ways in which we address major societal challenges—such as transforming the energy system to meet the climate crisis, or our approaches to democracy, justice, and gender equality—are reflected in the design of energy systems in our homes. Technology in the home influences how we carry out everyday tasks, who is responsible for performing them, and who may be excluded. Technology can change norms and power relations. Social relationships and ways of thinking influence choices of technology. The projects within the program therefore focus on the challenges of a changing energy system, taking the home as their point of departure. These challenges have technical and economic dimensions as well as social and political ones.

The energy transition in Sweden shows similarities to transitions in other parts of the world, but also differences. Many technical components—such as solar panels, batteries, mobile phones, and the internet—together with some basic social factors, constitute a shared global platform. At the same time, other technical, economic, social, and political structures differ from country to country, and often within countries between centers and peripheries. An important purpose of an international perspective is therefore to draw lessons from other countries within and beyond Europe and to make use of these experiences in the transformation of the Swedish energy system.

The home is an arena where the social, technical, political, and economic dimensions intersect. On this basis, we develop our research questions from these four dimensions.

Four dimensions

The social dimension: energy use as a social and cultural practice

Electricity use is to a large extent part of our social lives. Making electricity use more sustainable and taking advantage of the opportunities offered by digitalization requires new ways of living, working, consuming, and moving. For large numbers of people to adopt more sustainable and climate-smart behaviors, a deeper understanding is needed of how electricity use is connected to social identities, habits, and ideas of what constitutes quality of life for different social groups. How energy-related behavior varies between different groups in society, and how it is influenced by policy measures, is a central part of the program. Within this dimension, we pose, among others, the following questions:

  • What social factors influence the behavior of residential electricity users and motivate or hinder changes in their habits?
  • How can smart grids be understood and designed to promote the development of sustainable lifestyles for people with different conditions and needs?
  • How can conflicts between environmental sustainability goals and social goals be avoided?
  • How can power structures that arise in the home as part of the implementation of smart energy technologies be made visible?
  • How can resource-poor and marginalized households be supported in their efforts to reduce electricity costs and actively contribute to the energy transition?
  • How can new social contexts (communities, networks, coalitions, etc.) be used to strengthen the drivers of behavioral change?
  • Are there social patterns in Sweden that facilitate or hinder the transition, and what can we learn in this respect from comparisons with other countries?

The technical dimension: digital services in practice

When the technical dimension is placed at the center alongside the social dimension, different questions about people’s everyday lives come to the fore. Services based on digital technology are becoming increasingly common, and the automation of electricity use in people’s homes entails hidden complexity and vulnerability in the electricity system. One aim within the technical dimension is to explore how large numbers of people, via digital services, engage with the smart grid, and how their awareness, trust, motivation, and participation in the grid’s flexibility, efficiency, and balance are affected. We address questions concerning the design of new types of informative and automated services, with or without AI support, the security and vulnerability risks these may entail, and how an effective division of labor between human and non-human actors can be achieved. Examples of questions posed within this dimension include:

  • How are digital services perceived and used by electricity consumers?
  • How do different stakeholders, in both policy and practice, perceive data related to the smart grid: as a resource, a tool, a value, or a problem?
  • What characterizes a smart digital service that supports electricity consumers in making informed choices from different perspectives, and how do users relate to automation and AI in such services?
  • What does increased digitalization of the electricity system mean for security and trust?
  • How can we help ensure that people feel trust in different actors and that these actors act in their best interests, for example by safeguarding personal privacy and fairness?
  • How can trust be created between households and smart grids—that is, the digital technologies and the actors that control them, such as electricity retailers and service developers
  • How do digital services and automation in Sweden differ from those in other parts of the world?

The political dimension: power, influence, and regulatory frameworks

The engagement, participation, and sense of responsibility of large numbers of people are crucial to the energy transition. Energy democracy, energy justice, and energy citizenship have become key concepts in the European vision of future sustainable energy systems. Individual initiatives and cooperative ownership are often highlighted as ideals, while representative forms are marginalized. Within the political dimension, we pose, for example, the following questions:

  • How can political policy instruments be developed to support a more inclusive and just energy transition?
  • How can large numbers of people gain greater influence and a more active role in shaping the energy systems in their homes?
  • What drives and what hinders inclusive collective ownership of smart energy solutions?
  • What drives and what hinders representative solutions?
  • Who represents different groups in electricity grid–related issues?
  • Is representative democracy better than direct individual engagement for certain energy issues?
  • What drives and what hinders greater individual prosumer and consumer influence in the electricity grid?
  • What impact does political discourse have on electricity consumers’ awareness of energy-related societal challenges and their motivation to contribute to a climate-smart energy system?
  • How do culture, power structures, and institutions influence which forms of power and influence over the electricity system emerge in different countries?

The economic dimension: prices, policy instruments, and goal conflicts  

Increased flexibility in electricity consumption is crucial for a rapid transformation of the energy system. The primary policy instruments for this purpose are dynamic grid tariffs and electricity retail contracts. In the wake of the energy crisis, electricity consumers’ awareness has increased, as has their motivation to be part of the solution. However, there are factors that risk slowing this development, such as conflicting price signals from capacity-based tariffs and spot prices, as well as a lack of standardization in a number of areas. At the same time, electricity consumers are a heterogeneous group with different needs, conditions, and willingness to participate. Against this background, we address, among others, the following questions:

  • How can we design an effective price signal that reflects both the momentary capacity of the electricity grid and the current spot price?
  • How can standardized solutions and pricing models for increased demand flexibility be designed while still being tailored to different segments of electricity consumers?
  • What perceptions do electricity consumers have of the respective roles and responsibilities of different actors in the energy transition and in future climate-smart energy systems?
  • Can a new actor—in the form of a local, non-profit, and independent “flex coordinator”—help activate flexibility resources among different groups of electricity consumers?
  • What innovative market solutions are being developed around the world to address the challenges of the new electricity system?

Phase 1

During the first program period, we explored how both new and established actors navigate the transformation of the electricity system, characterized by new technologies, new pricing models, new opportunities for influence, and new risks of exclusion. We also studied historical transitions and possible future development pathways. In short, we conclude that authorities’ and the industry’s views of electricity consumers are often overly simplified, leading to inadequate policy instruments; that information flows in the smart electricity system constitute a new, contested resource with an unclear legal framework; and that collaborations between different actors in the energy system involve many different types of values. The development of a fossil-free energy system is something far greater than an exercise in engineering optimization.